If you don't have a good reason to look for a particular effect size, you might as well admit that and draw a graph with sample size on the X-axis and effect size on the Y-axis. How big a change in gene expression are you looking for: 10%? 20%? 50%? It's a pretty arbitrary number, but it will have a huge effect on the number of transgenic mice who will give their expensive little lives for your science. Let's say you're doing a power analysis for a study of a mutation in a promoter region, to see if it affects gene expression. But for most basic biological research, the effect size is just a nice round number that you pulled out of your butt. If you're testing a chicken feed supplement that costs $1.50 per month, you're only interested in finding out whether it will produce more than $1.50 worth of extra eggs each month knowing that a supplement produces an extra 0.1 egg a month is not useful information to you, and you don't need to design your experiment to find that out. Occasionally, you'll have a good economic or clinical reason for choosing a particular effect size. If you're testing something to make the hens lay more eggs, the effect size might be 2 eggs per month. You would then say that your effect size is 10%. For example, if you are treating hens with something that you hope will change the sex ratio of their chicks, you might decide that the minimum change in the proportion of sexes that you're looking for is 10%. The effect size is the minimum deviation from the null hypothesis that you hope to detect. If you don't have a good reason for using a particular value, you can try different values and look at the effect on sample size. You must choose the values for each one before you do the analysis. There are four or five numbers involved in a power analysis. Because it is unlikely that there is such a big difference in autism between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, and because failing to find a relationship with such a study would not convince anti-vaccination kooks that there was no relationship ( nothing would convince them there's no relationship-that's what makes them kooks), the power analysis tells you that such a large, expensive study would not be worthwhile. A more plausible study, of 5,000 unvaccinated and 5,000 vaccinated children, would detect a significant difference with high power only if there were three times more autism in one group than the other. It is not clear what effect size would be interesting: 10% more autism in one group? 50% more? twice as much? However, doing a power analysis shows that even if the study included every unvaccinated child in the United States aged 3 to 6, and an equal number of vaccinated children, there would have to be 25% more autism in one group in order to have a high chance of seeing a significant difference. government conduct a large study of unvaccinated and vaccinated children to see whether vaccines cause autism. For example, some anti-vaccination kooks have proposed that the U.S. You should still do a power analysis before you do the experiment, just to get an idea of what kind of effects you could detect. When doing basic biological research, you often don't know how big a difference you're looking for, and the temptation may be to just use the biggest sample size you can afford, or use a similar sample size to other research in your field. That would be your effect size, and you would use it when deciding how many dogs you would need to put through the canine reflectometer. For example, if you're testing a new dog shampoo, the marketing department at your company may tell you that producing the new shampoo would only be worthwhile if it made dogs' coats at least 25% shinier, on average. For applied and clinical biological research, there may be a very definite effect size that you want to detect. This is the size of the difference between your null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis that you hope to detect. In order to do a power analysis, you need to specify an effect size.
Methods have been developed for many statistical tests to estimate the sample size needed to detect a particular effect, or to estimate the size of the effect that can be detected with a particular sample size. This is especially true if you're proposing to do something painful to humans or other vertebrates, where it is particularly important to minimize the number of individuals (without making the sample size so small that the whole experiment is a waste of time and suffering), or if you're planning a very time-consuming or expensive experiment. When you are designing an experiment, it is a good idea to estimate the sample size you'll need. Before you do an experiment, you should perform a power analysis to estimate the number of observations you need to have a good chance of detecting the effect you're looking for.
0 kommentar(er)
